<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Futures &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures</link>
	<description>A blog about information management, architecture and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Simpler, smarter searching</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2009/03/simpler-smarter-searching/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2009/03/simpler-smarter-searching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret L Ruwoldt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[implementation 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you had a bad experience in the past with using SuperSearch or the online library catalogue?
Responding to feedback collected last year from students and staff, our fabulous Library Systems team spent this summer making changes to SuperSearch and the online catalogue.
From the start of Semester One 2009, searching for a journal article or library [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you had a bad experience in the past with using SuperSearch or the online library catalogue?</p>
<p>Responding to feedback collected last year from students and staff, our fabulous Library Systems team spent this summer making changes to SuperSearch and the online catalogue.</p>
<p>From the start of Semester One 2009, searching for a journal article or library book should now be much easier and faster. We have also created links between the catalogue and other systems so that, if an item is unavailable at Melbourne, you can easily request an inter-library loan without abandoning your current search.</p>
<p>There are a few problems we can&#8217;t yet fix. For example, you may still need to retype your password occasionally when using SuperSearch – but we have significantly reduced the number of times this is likely to happen.</p>
<p>Students, staff and alumni can access SuperSearch and the Library catalogue directly from the <a href="http://www.lib.unimelb.edu.au/" title="Home page of the University Library">Library&#8217;s home page</a>, or via the Learning Management System (LMS). The main catalogue is also available to the public.</p>
<p>Bouquets, comments and suggestions for further improvements are always welcome – email &nbsp;<a href="mailto:info-futures@unimelb.edu.au" title="mailto:info-futures@unimelb.edu.au">info-futures at unimelb.edu.au</a> to let us know what you think of the SuperSearch and catalogue searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2009/03/simpler-smarter-searching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How was it for you?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2008/04/how-was-it-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2008/04/how-was-it-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret L Ruwoldt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny kingsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2008/04/how-was-it-for-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Information Futures Commission is running an online survey called Outstanding! (What would that feel like?).
This 15-minute questionnaire asks students, staff and other scholars to describe, in their own words, how they find, use and share scholarly information.
In part, the survey was inspired by Danny Kingsley&#8217;s PhD research at the Australian National University. By surveying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Information Futures Commission is running an <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kAJ91WpSnTkOmB8LibFB8Q_3d_3d" title="Online survey about your experience of finding, using and sharing scholarly information">online survey called Outstanding! (What would that feel like?)</a>.</p>
<p>This 15-minute questionnaire asks students, staff and other scholars to describe, in their own words, how they find, use and share scholarly information.</p>
<p>In part, the survey was inspired by Danny Kingsley&#8217;s PhD research at the Australian National University. By surveying almost 300 academics Danny identified discipline-specific differences in how academics find and publish scholarly information.</p>
<p>The table below is based on my notes of a presentation given by Danny at the VALA 2008 conference. The full text of the refereed paper is available from the <a href="http://www.vala.org.au/vala2008/prog2008.htm" title="conference program and papers">conference web site</a>.</p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tablehd">Behavior</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tablehd">Chemist</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tablehd">Sociologist</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tablehd">Computer scientist</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt"><strong>Preferred mode of publication for own work</strong></p>
<p class="tabletxt">(prestige, career development)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Small number of refereed journals</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Books, monographs, some refereed journals</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Conference proceedings</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt"><strong>Undirected search</strong></p>
<p class="tabletxt">(keeping up with my discipline)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Regular systematic skimming of publishers&#8217; alerts,   newsfeeds, tables of contents</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Very little &#8212; prefer to rely on serendipity, personal   collection of books and journals</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Attend specific conferences to gossip (not listen to   presentations)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt"><strong>Directed search</strong></p>
<p class="tabletxt">(answering a specific question)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Primarily via databases. Little use of public search   engines (seen as low prestige)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Snowball &#8212; a mix of texts and papers</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="236">
<p class="tabletxt">Google it, then link (or republish) from own web site,   regardless of copyright</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Will we find similar  patterns among students and academics at the University of Melbourne?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kAJ91WpSnTkOmB8LibFB8Q_3d_3d" title="Click to go to the survey form">Outstanding! survey</a> will be online until Friday 9 May. It takes about 15 minutes to complete, and we&#8217;d love to hear <em>your</em> voice. What&#8217;s your experience of finding and using scholarly information?</p>
<p>If all the current barriers disappeared and you were working or studying in an ideal environment, what would that environment be like? How would it feel? How would you do things differently from today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/informationfutures/2008/04/how-was-it-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
