<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Library Intelligencer &#187; collection development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/category/collection-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer</link>
	<description>This blog is to provide information to University of Melbourne Library staff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moving Beyond Citation Analysis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/30/moving-beyond-citation-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/30/moving-beyond-citation-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=4127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.ala.org./ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/&#8230;
How Surveys and Interviews Enhance, Enrich, and Expand Your Research Findings
A traditional mixed methods research model of citation analysis, a survey, and interviews was selected to determine if the Bruce T. Halle Library at Eastern Michigan University owned the content faculty cited in their research, if the collection was being utilized, and what library services [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.ala.org./ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/preprints/Storm-deVries-Kelly.pdf" title="http://www.ala.org./ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/preprints/Storm-deVries-Kelly.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ala.org./ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.ala.org./ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/preprints/Storm-deVries-Kelly.pdf"></p>
<p>How Surveys and Interviews Enhance, Enrich, and Expand Your Research Findings<br />
A traditional mixed methods research model of citation analysis, a survey, and interviews was selected to determine if the Bruce T. Halle Library at Eastern Michigan University owned the content faculty cited in their research, if the collection was being utilized, and what library services the faculty used. The combination of objective data gleaned from the citation analysis and survey coupled with the personal, in-depth information gained from the interviews was instrumental in increasing the value of the study for its use in collection management decisions, and showed how effectual the services and collection are in supporting the research needs of the faculty at EMU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/30/moving-beyond-citation-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Significance 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/21/significance-20/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/21/significance-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://significance.collectionscouncil.com.au/home
Significance defines the meanings and values of a cultural heritage item or collection through research and analysis, and by assessment against a standard set of criteria.
Significance 2.0 was written by Roslyn Russell and Kylie Winkworth for the Collections Council of Australia.
This website allows you to:
read Significance 2.0 on screen and print by the page NEW!
contribute [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://si<a href="http://significance.collectionscouncil.com.au/home">gnificance.collectionscouncil.com.au/home</a></p>
<p>Significance defines the meanings and values of a cultural heritage item or collection through research and analysis, and by assessment against a standard set of criteria.</p>
<p>Significance 2.0 was written by Roslyn Russell and Kylie Winkworth for the Collections Council of Australia.</p>
<p>This website allows you to:</p>
<p>read Significance 2.0 on screen and print by the page NEW!<br />
contribute comments to an Open Forum on any aspect of this project, including suggestions towards Significance 2.1 NEW!<br />
print and download PDF files of Significance 2.0 – the book<br />
access the full version of ‘Part 6 – Significance in action – applications’<br />
purchase hard copies of the book for AUD $29.95 plus postage and handling, while stocks last<br />
subscribe to the Collections Council’s e-Bulletin that will include Significance updates </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/21/significance-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Collections as Laboratories</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/19/special-collections-as-laboratories/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/19/special-collections-as-laboratories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Special-Collections-as/8490/?sid=wc&#38;utm_source=wc&#38;utm_medium=en
Washington&#8211;Don&#8217;t lock your special collections away in neglected corners of the library &#8212; use them to teach students about the possibilities and principles of research. Such collections should be put to use as laboratories where students work hands-on with primary documents, incorporate them &#8230;.
source: Chronicle of Higher Education
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Special-Collections-as/8490/?sid=wc&amp;utm_source=wc&amp;utm_medium=en">http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Special-Collections-as/8490/?sid=wc&amp;utm_source=wc&amp;utm_medium=en</a></p>
<p>Washington&#8211;Don&#8217;t lock your special collections away in neglected corners of the library &#8212; use them to teach students about the possibilities and principles of research. Such collections should be put to use as laboratories where students work hands-on with primary documents, incorporate them &#8230;.</p>
<p>source: Chronicle of Higher Education</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/19/special-collections-as-laboratories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Columbia and Cornell Libraries Announce New Partnership</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/16/columbia-and-cornell-libraries-announce-new-partnership/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/16/columbia-and-cornell-libraries-announce-new-partnership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academic libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.library.cornell.edu/news/0910&#8230;
The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation has awarded $385,000 to the libraries at Columbia University in New York City and Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., to support the development of an innovative partnership dubbed “2CUL.” This new relationship has the potential to become the most expansive collaboration to date between major research libraries.
Starting this fall, Cornell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.library.cornell.edu/news/091012/2cul" title="http://www.library.cornell.edu/news/091012/2cul" target="_blank">http://www.library.cornell.edu/news/0910&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.library.cornell.edu/news/091012/2cul"></p>
<p>The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation has awarded $385,000 to the libraries at Columbia University in New York City and Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., to support the development of an innovative partnership dubbed “2CUL.” This new relationship has the potential to become the most expansive collaboration to date between major research libraries.</p>
<p>Starting this fall, Cornell and Columbia will plan significant partnerships in collaborative collection development, acquisitions and processing. The two universities will form a separate service entity to facilitate the collaboration. Ithaka, a not-for-profit organization that assists research libraries and the academic community to leverage advancing information technologies, will provide project management and assist in the planning. Initial work will focus on several global collecting areas, as well as collaborative funding and support of technical infrastructure in various areas.</p>
<p>2CUL — pronounced “too cool” — stands for the acronyms of both Columbia University Library and Cornell University Library. The partnership is not a merger, and the two libraries remain separate institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/16/columbia-and-cornell-libraries-announce-new-partnership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-book Collections, SPEC Kit 313, Published by ARL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/05/e-book-collections-spec-kit-313-published-by-arl/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/05/e-book-collections-spec-kit-313-published-by-arl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec313.shtml
Washington DC—The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) has published E-book Collections, SPEC Kit 313, which examines the current use of e-books in ARL member libraries; their plans for implementing, increasing, or decreasing access to e-books; purchasing, cataloging, and collection management issues; and issues in marketing to and in usage by library clientele.
By the May deadline, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec313.shtml" title="http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec313.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec313.shtml</a><a href="http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec313.shtml"></p>
<p>Washington DC—The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) has published E-book Collections, SPEC Kit 313, which examines the current use of e-books in ARL member libraries; their plans for implementing, increasing, or decreasing access to e-books; purchasing, cataloging, and collection management issues; and issues in marketing to and in usage by library clientele.</p>
<p>By the May deadline, responses had been submitted by 75 of the 123 ARL member libraries for a response rate of 61%. Of the responding libraries, 73 (97%) reported including e-books in their collections.</p>
<p>According to survey responses, most institutions entered the e-book arena as part of a consortium which purchased an e-book package. The earliest forays occurred in the 1990s but the majority of libraries started e-book collections between 1999 and 2004. Purchasing at the collection level allowed libraries to acquire a mass of titles with a common interface, reducing some of the transition pains to the new format. The downside of collections is that libraries find they are often saddled with titles they would not have selected in print; also, each collection might have a different interface, adding to user frustration. </p>
<p>Those libraries reporting success with individually selected e-book titles cope with other problems: lag time between print and electronic publication (with electronic the lagging format), restrictive digital rights management, loss of access by ILL, and limited printing top the list of concerns. However, responses indicate a preference for title-by-title selection as a more efficient use of funds.</p>
<p>This SPEC Kit includes documentation from respondents in the form of collection development policies, e-book collection Web pages, e-book promotional materials, training materials for staff and users, and e-book reader loan policies.</p>
<p>The table of contents and executive summary from this SPEC Kit are available online at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec-313-web.pdf" title="http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec-313-web.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec-313-web.p&#8230;</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/10/05/e-book-collections-spec-kit-313-published-by-arl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Withdraw: Print Collections Management in the Wake of Digitization</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/30/what-to-withdraw-print-collections-management-in-the-wake-of-digitization/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/30/what-to-withdraw-print-collections-management-in-the-wake-of-digitization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/researc&#8230;
A new report from Ithaka S+R examines when libraries can rely on digitized journals and responsibly save shelf space by withdrawing print collections
New York, NY September 29 &#8211; As large-scale digitization efforts ensue, how do libraries determine when to retain print collections?  What to Withdraw: Print Collections Management in the Wake of Digitization  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/what-to-withdraw" title="http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/what-to-withdraw" target="_blank">http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/researc&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/what-to-withdraw"></p>
<p>A new report from Ithaka S+R examines when libraries can rely on digitized journals and responsibly save shelf space by withdrawing print collections</p>
<p>New York, NY September 29 &#8211; As large-scale digitization efforts ensue, how do libraries determine when to retain print collections?  What to Withdraw: Print Collections Management in the Wake of Digitization  , a new report released today from Ithaka S+R, the strategy and research arm of the not-for-profit organization ITHAKA &nbsp;<a href="http://www.ithaka.org" title="http://www.ithaka.(" target="_blank">www.ithaka.org</a>), analyzes which types of journals can be withdrawn responsibly today and how that set of materials can be expanded to allow libraries the maximum possible flexibility and savings in the future.</p>
<p>&#8220;Determining the value of retaining print after its digitization requires a system-wide analysis of the needs of all libraries and their users collectively, rather than focusing only on a region, a system, or a consortium,&#8221; stated Roger Schonfeld, Manager of Research at Ithaka S+R and co-author of this report.  &#8220;Our analysis indicates that libraries today can safely de-accession certain print holdings that are adequately preserved in digital and print form elsewhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Analyzing the rationales for retaining and preserving scholarly journals in print format, the report proposes minimum time periods for which some system-wide access to print versions is required. Then, based on a study commissioned by Ithaka S+R and conducted by Candace Yano, a professor of industrial engineering and operations research and in the Haas School of Business at UC Berkley, the report proposes the minimum number of print copies that are required today depending on their condition.</p>
<p>Based on this analysis, the report concludes that certain print journal backfile sets are well enough digitized and contain few enough images that there is likely to be virtually no demand for them by users, and are sufficiently well preserved digitally and in print repositories that libraries can responsibly withdraw their own print holdings.</p>
<p>At the same time, the report warns that other print materials may not yet be ready for broad withdrawal without raising risks unduly. For these materials, a number of strategies are recommended for allowing libraries increased flexibility in the future. First, organizations responsible for digitization programs should provide more transparency on the quality of their digitization work and should participate in an ongoing effort to upgrade the quality of the scans. In addition, libraries should deepen existing collaborations around print preservation, perhaps bringing in publishers and other digitizers as partners in this effort.</p>
<p>&#8220;Libraries are right to push aggressively into the digital future but should do so with an awareness about risk and tradeoffs,&#8221;<br />
stated Ross Housewright, analyst and co-author.  &#8220;There is an opportunity before us to make a system-wide impact on print collection management, but in order to do so libraries and digitizers need to commit to collaboration at a level unseen today.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ithaka S+R<br />
Ithaka S+R &nbsp;<a href="http://www.ithaka.org" title="http://www.ithaka.(" target="_blank">www.ithaka.org</a>) is the strategy and research arm of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. The Ithaka S+R team supports innovation in higher education by working with initiatives and organizations to develop sustainable business models and by conducting research and analysis on the impact of digital media on the academic community as a whole. Insights from these efforts are shared broadly, with more than a dozen reports freely available online. JSTOR, an accessible archive of more than 1,000 scholarly journals and other content, and Portico, a service that preserves content published in electronic form for future generations, are also part of ITHAKA.</p>
<p>Contact:<br />
Heidi McGregor<br />
VP Marketing &amp; Communications<br />
ITHAKA<br />
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:heidi.mcgregor@ithaka.org" title="mailto:heidi.mcgregor@ithaka.org">heidi.mcgregor at ithaka.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/30/what-to-withdraw-print-collections-management-in-the-wake-of-digitization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collections Council of Australia seeks new benchmarks for collections policy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/22/collections-council-of-australia-seeks-new-benchmarks-for-collections-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/22/collections-council-of-australia-seeks-new-benchmarks-for-collections-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.collectionscouncil.com.au/med&#8230;
The Collections Council of Australia plans to develop and promote a new model for
sustainable scientific and cultural collections in Australia.
The Council’s Chair, Noel Turnbull, said today that such a model is an urgent national
priority for nation-wide benchmarks, policy development and funding of the collections
sector.
He said the Council plans to consult with the sector and look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.collectionscouncil.com.au/media+room.aspx?DMXModule=543&amp;EntryId=2092&amp;Command=Core_Download" title="http://www.collectionscouncil.com.au/media+room.aspx?DMXModule=543&amp;EntryId=2092&amp;Command=Core_Download" target="_blank">http://www.collectionscouncil.com.au/med&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.collectionscouncil.com.au/media+room.aspx?DMXModule=543&amp;EntryId=2092&amp;Command=Core_Download"></p>
<p>The Collections Council of Australia plans to develop and promote a new model for<br />
sustainable scientific and cultural collections in Australia.<br />
The Council’s Chair, Noel Turnbull, said today that such a model is an urgent national<br />
priority for nation-wide benchmarks, policy development and funding of the collections<br />
sector.<br />
He said the Council plans to consult with the sector and look at a variety of international<br />
models which could be adapted to Australian needs &#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/22/collections-council-of-australia-seeks-new-benchmarks-for-collections-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Approaches to Managing and Collecting Born-Digital Literary Materials for Scholarly Use</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/05/15/approaches-to-managing-and-collecting-born-digital-literary-materials-for-scholarly-use/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/05/15/approaches-to-managing-and-collecting-born-digital-literary-materials-for-scholarly-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital preservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.neh.gov/ODH/Default.aspx?tabi&#8230;
Abstract: Digital Humanities Initiative Level 1 Start Up funding is requested to support a series of site visits and planning meetings among personnel working with the born-digital components of three significant collections of literary material: the Salman Rushdie papers at Emory University&#8217;s Woodruff Library, the Michael Joyce Papers at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.neh.gov/ODH/Default.aspx?tabid=111&amp;id=37" title="http://www.neh.gov/ODH/Default.aspx?tabid=111&amp;id=37" target="_blank">http://www.neh.gov/ODH/Default.aspx?tabi&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.neh.gov/ODH/Default.aspx?tabid=111&amp;id=37"></p>
<p>Abstract: Digital Humanities Initiative Level 1 Start Up funding is requested to support a series of site visits and planning meetings among personnel working with the born-digital components of three significant collections of literary material: the Salman Rushdie papers at Emory University&#8217;s Woodruff Library, the Michael Joyce Papers at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin, and the Deena Larsen Collection at the Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities (MITH) at the University of Maryland. The meetings and site visits will facilitate the preparation of a larger collaborative grant proposal among the three institutions aimed at developing archival tools and best practices for preserving and curating the born-digital documents and records of contemporary authorship. Initial findings will be made available through a jointly authored and publicly distributed online white paper, as well as conference presentations at relevant venues.</p>
<p>source: DigitalKoans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/05/15/approaches-to-managing-and-collecting-born-digital-literary-materials-for-scholarly-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>request survey responses on library budgeting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/03/05/request-survey-responses-on-library-budgeting/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/03/05/request-survey-responses-on-library-budgeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academic libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please forgive the duplication; this message has been cross-posted to ACQNET, COLLDV-L, and ERIL. Feel free to forward.
 Dear Colleagues,
 We would like to kindly request your participation in a survey on libraries’ changes to their approval plans. We are gathering data for a presentation to take place at the Timberline Acquisitions Institute in May [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please forgive the duplication; this message has been cross-posted to ACQNET, COLLDV-L, and ERIL. Feel free to forward.</p>
<p> Dear Colleagues,</p>
<p> We would like to kindly request your participation in a survey on libraries’ changes to their approval plans. We are gathering data for a presentation to take place at the Timberline Acquisitions Institute in May 2009. The survey will provide us with information on how libraries are budgeting for print monographs, taking into account both approval plans and firm order allocations, in response to twin pressures from the economy and the need to provide electronic resources. The survey includes questions relating to recent and expected changes in libraries’ material budgets, budget percents devoted to approvals and firm orders, and reasons for changing those allocations.</p>
<p>The survey should take approximately 20 minutes to complete, and you can exit the survey at any time. Demographic data is requested in order to determine the level of comparison with our own type and size of institution.<br />
Please follow the link to take the survey:<br />
&nbsp;<a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=XXpOhKdF7g7D_2f_2f9wKHSo1Q_3d_3d" title="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=XXpOhKdF7g7D_2f_2f9wKHSo1Q_3d_3d" target="_blank">http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=XX&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your time. The survey will remain open until Monday, April 6, 2009. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Joseph Thomas (&nbsp;<a href="mailto:thomasw@ecu.edu" title="mailto:thomasw@ecu.edu">thomasw at ecu.edu</a>) or Lisa Barricella (&nbsp;<a href="mailto:barricellal@ecu.edu" title="mailto:barricellal@ecu.edu">barricellal at ecu.edu</a>).<br />
Respectfully,<br />
 Joseph Thomas, Collection Development Librarian<br />
Lisa Barricella, Acquisitions Librarian</p>
<p>Wm. Joseph Thomas</p>
<p>Head of Collection Development</p>
<p>1207 Joyner Library</p>
<p>East Carolina University</p>
<p>Greenville, NC 27858</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:thomasw@ecu.edu" title="mailto:thomasw@ecu.edu">thomasw at ecu.edu</a></p>
<p>office: 252-737-2728</p>
<p>fax: 252-328-4834</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/03/05/request-survey-responses-on-library-budgeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
