<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Library Intelligencer &#187; peer review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/category/peer-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer</link>
	<description>This blog is to provide information to University of Melbourne Library staff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The importance of data quality for research quality assessment</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/24/the-importance-of-data-quality-for-research-quality-assessment/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/24/the-importance-of-data-quality-for-research-quality-assessment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academic libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.arc.gov.au/media/arc_presenta&#8230;
presentation by Andrew Calder, Direcotr, Research Performance and Analysis, Australian Research Council, to Elsevier Research Trends and Innovation Meeting 2009 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.arc.gov.au/media/arc_presentations.htm" title="http://www.arc.gov.au/media/arc_presentations.htm" target="_blank">http://www.arc.gov.au/media/arc_presenta&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.arc.gov.au/media/arc_presentations.htm"></p>
<p>presentation by Andrew Calder, Direcotr, Research Performance and Analysis, Australian Research Council, to Elsevier Research Trends and Innovation Meeting 2009 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/24/the-importance-of-data-quality-for-research-quality-assessment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARC Peer Review Processes Consultation Paper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/16/arc-peer-review-processes-consultation-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/16/arc-peer-review-processes-consultation-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/?p=3559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://www.arc.gov.au/general/peer_consu&#8230;
The Consultation Paper outlines a range of issues and potential improvements the ARC is considering as part of its review of peer review processes. 
The ARC released the Consultation Paper on 14 September 2009 to seek feedback on specific issues relating to ARC’s peer review processes. 
The consultation period will close on 19 October 2009.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://www.arc.gov.au/general/peer_consultation.htm" title="http://www.arc.gov.au/general/peer_consultation.htm" target="_blank">http://www.arc.gov.au/general/peer_consu&#8230;</a><a href="http://www.arc.gov.au/general/peer_consultation.htm"></p>
<p>The Consultation Paper outlines a range of issues and potential improvements the ARC is considering as part of its review of peer review processes. </p>
<p>The ARC released the Consultation Paper on 14 September 2009 to seek feedback on specific issues relating to ARC’s peer review processes. </p>
<p>The consultation period will close on 19 October 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/16/arc-peer-review-processes-consultation-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Web-based peer-review systems</title>
		<link>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2008/09/17/the-evolution-of-web-based-peer-review-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2008/09/17/the-evolution-of-web-based-peer-review-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2008/09/17/the-evolution-of-web-based-peer-review-systems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nbsp;http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X3567&#8230;
this article is open access
Authors: Tananbaum, Greg; Holmes, Lyndon
Source: Learned Publishing, Volume 21, Number 4, October 2008 , pp. 300-306(7)
Publisher: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Abstract:
Web-based peer-review systems are ubiquitous within scholarly publishing today, providing valuable efficiencies for authors, editors, and referees. These systems are the result of a general evolution from paper-based workflows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356734" title="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356734" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X3567&#8230;</a><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356734"></p>
<p>this article is open access<br />
Authors: Tananbaum, Greg; Holmes, Lyndon</p>
<p>Source: Learned Publishing, Volume 21, Number 4, October 2008 , pp. 300-306(7)</p>
<p>Publisher: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers<br />
Abstract:<br />
Web-based peer-review systems are ubiquitous within scholarly publishing today, providing valuable efficiencies for authors, editors, and referees. These systems are the result of a general evolution from paper-based workflows to electronic processes that began in the 1970s. DOS-based systems paved the way for Windows desktop systems and, in the mid-1990s, Web-based peer review. Governmental, academic, and commercial stakeholders all participated in advancing the state of peer review by experimenting with different technologies, workflows, and features. These experiments have coalesced into a new steady state in which Web-based peer-review systems are the norm, and in which continued evolution tends to focus on incremental improvements to traditional workflow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2008/09/17/the-evolution-of-web-based-peer-review-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
