New Acquisition: L’Accusateur Public (French Counter-Revolutionary Journal)

Special Collections recently acquired a complete set of one of the most influential French counter-revolutionary journals: L’Accusateur public. Only a few issues are available on-line through Gallica (the digital library of the Bibliothèque nationale de France), and the only other recorded set in the country is held by the National Library of Australia, making the University of Melbourne copy a valuable resource for students and scholars, and a fine addition to our holdings of material on the French Revolution.

 

Page 1, first issue
First issue, p. 1

 

L’Accusateur public was founded by the Jean Thomas Élisabeth Richer-Sérisy (1759–1803) shortly after his release from prison on 27 September 1794. Printed in Paris by Mathieu Migneret, the journal ran for thirty-five numbered issues until 1797 and brought Richer-Sérisy considerable popularity as a public writer.[1]

Such notoriety of course did not go unnoticed by Revolutionary factions, nor did the fact that Richer-Sérisy’s energetic and vehement writing barely hid his Royalist opinions. His L’Accusateur public even outsold some of the pro-revolutionary periodicals, such as the Journal universal.[2] The year after The Directory seized power in the Coup of 18 Fructidor an V (4 September 1797), Richer-Sérisy was sentenced to deportation to Cayenne, French Guiana. He escaped and eventually made his way to England where he spent his remaining years. The last issue he edited (No. 35), dated 1 Frimaire an VII (21 November 1798), was seized by the police.

 

The revolutionary Constitutional Circle (also known as Club de Salm)
Cartoon of the pro-Directory ‘Constitutional Circle’ known as the Club de Salm

 

The acquisition also included the two unnumbered, counterfeit issues that appeared after No. 35.[3] The first is dated 6 Thermidor an VII (24 July 1799). Unlike the numbered series, Richer-Sérisy’s name is nowhere to be found, since he had already fled from France. According to Brunet’s Manuel du libraire … (Paris, 1860-1865 ed.), the issue was instead edited by the pro-royalist general Louis Michel Auguste Thévenet Danican (1764-1848).[4]

Perhaps without Richer-Sérisy’s name the issue failed to sell widely, for when a single issue of a second series appeared, possibly edited by Danican, it closed with a reprinted letter by Richer-Sérisy dated ‘Berlin, 10 Mai 1799’. Richer-Sérisy, however, upon reading or hearing about the issue, declared it a forgery.[5] Its editor(s) presumably used his name as an attempt to give the new series credibility and popular appeal.

 

'Richer-Serisy' letter, 10 May 1799
The supposed Richer-Serisy letter, 10 May 1799

 

A final point about the Melbourne copy not mentioned in the sale catalogue. On the recto of the first issue half-title is a rather worn ownership stamp, that of the Comte Joseph-François de Kergariou (1779-1849), bibliophile, prefect of Indre-et-Loire, and Napoleon’s chamberlain.

 Anthony Tedeschi (Deputy Curator, Special Collections)

—-

[1] Although the final issue is numbered ’35’ there are actually thirty-four volumes in total. Issue No. 13, which was to contain an account of the battle between Revolutionary and Royalist forces in the streets of Paris on 13 Vendémiaire an IV (5 October 1795), was never published (perhaps not even Richer-Sérisy could spin the Royalist’s defeat). For more on its printer, Migneret, see Carla Hesse’s Publishing and Cultural Politics in Revolutionary Paris, 1789-1810 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991) available on-line through the UC Press E-Books Collection (accessed 13.3.2014)

[2] Kenneth Margerison, ‘P.-L. Roederer: Political Thought and Practice During the French Revolution’ in Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 1:1 (1983): 117

[3] The two unnumbered issues appear to be quite scarce. I was able to locate just three copies worldwide of the issue dated 6 Thermidor an VII and only two copies of the second series issue. No other copies are recorded in other Australian institutions.

[4] Charles Brunet, Manuel du libraire et de l’amateur de livres … 6 vols. (Paris: Firmin Didot frères, fils et Cie, 1860-1865), 6:1869-1870

[5] University of Pennsylvania Libraries catalogue: http://www.franklin.library.upenn.edu/record.html?id=FRANKLIN_13561 [No citation regarding the forgery comment given]


Do you know what an Arithmometer is for? Check out the National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Objects Collection Available Soon..

Arithmometer, Thomas de Colmar c. 1870, 2013.0112 National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Objects Collection, University of Melbourne Archives
Arithmometer, Thomas de Colmar c. 1870, 2013.0112 National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Objects Collection, University of Melbourne Archives

In this post industrial era devices such as the stapler, photocopier and computer have
become ubiquitous features of daily office life. We have come to rely on them
to save us time and effort on tasks that once required hours of labour, but
where did they come from and what did the original inventions look like?. The
National Mutual Life Association of Australasia NMLA collection held at the
University of Melbourne Archives UMA contains a treasure trove of nineteenth
and twentieth century office machines, that once had an active life and were
considered to be innovative technology in their day. These objects which now
serve as artefacts from a bygone era can still provide us with insight into
what working life might have once been like. Machines such as the ‘Arithmometer’,
invented in the 1870s were used in acuturial science from the mid 1880s and there
is surviving evidence that that tells us the ‘Arithmometer’ with its modern
levers and switches was once a highly valued and prized object because it had
been well looked after and stored in its own specially handcrafted carry case.
The ‘Magnaphone K54 model’ a small grey chrome plated box with a prominent gold
mesh amplifier produced in 1948 could be considered to be the forerunner of the
handsfree technology we take for granted today because it was one of the first
inventions which allowed company employees to conduct ‘handsfree’ conversations
on standard phones. The inscription on the front cautions the user to ’Always
replace handset on your telephone after using magnaphone’. Sound advice!

The finding aid for this fascinating office collection,which will be available through the UMA
online catalogue in April 2014 will provide scholars and researchers interested in mechanical curios and office memorabilia with a wealth of detail and images. UMA would also like to thank Shane Talia, Cultural Heritage student intern for all his work on the NMLA objects project.


Story of Melbourne’s Outer Circle Railway: Book Republished 2014

Bridge Over Yarra River http://www.boroondara.vic.gov.au/our-city/history/resources/outer-circle-railway/bridgeoveryarrariver
Bridge Over Yarra River http://www.boroondara.vic.gov.au/our-city/history/resources/outer-circle-railway/bridgeoveryarrariver

Dr David Beardsell is a research scientist and lecturer in Plant Science at the University of Melbourne. The first edition of his book on the history of the Outer Circle Railway was first published in 1979. He is currently rewriting a much enlarged second edition for publication in late 2014. David has published over 100 scientific papers and has written books on the natural history of the Yarra River, native orchids of Victoria, Victorian Railway locomotives and the public gardens of the Dandenong Ranges.

The Outer Circle Railway has always attracted attention because of the linear parkland that remains as reminder of the political intrigue of Melbourne’s land boom era of the 1880s. This railway once linked Oakleigh with Fairfield Park through what was then the picturesque wooded hills on the eastern fringes of Melbourne. In the 1890s, this region was lightly populated with scattered farms and orchards, and as such could not sustain a profitable railway. Nevertheless, the Outer Circle Railway was operated in sections and no trains ever ran the complete journey from Fairfield Park to Oakleigh. The entire railway only operated for two years from 1891-93, however various sections of the line were used for different periods over the next 120 years.

The Railway had its genesis in the early 1870s as an alternative route to connect the Gippsland line to the Victorian Railways system with its main terminus at Spencer Street. In 1872, the then Engineer-in-Chief of the Victorian Railways, Thomas Higinbotham, suggested that the Gippsland Railway from Sale to Oakleigh could best enter Melbourne via an “outer circle route” through Camberwell, Kew, North Fitzroy and North Melbourne. This would have allowed the Government to avoid the contentious purchase of the privately owned Melbourne and Hobson’s Bay United Railway Company which operated lines in Melbourne’s southern and south eastern suburbs. Thomas Higinbotham also saw the Outer Circle as a means of providing Melbourne’s northern and north eastern suburbs including Doncaster with a much needed railway.

The Government however subsequently purchased the Melbourne and Hobson’s Bay United Railway Company in 1878 thus avoiding the need for the construction of the Outer Circle Railway. In the early 1880s however, a group known as the Outer Circle Railway League re-formed in the inner northern suburbs and in Boroondara (Camberwell). This group, which had pressured parliamentarians in the 1870s, again focussed attention on the old Outer Circle Railway proposal. In the optimistic times of the land boom era of the 1880s politicians took a ‘please everyone’ attitude and approved the construction of railways throughout the colony of Victoria. Even though it was to serve no real purpose, the Outer Circle Railway, which extended from Oakleigh to Fairfield Park was included in the famous ‘Octopus’ Act of 1884. The Octopus Act was so named because the railways included in it spread over Victoria like the tentacles of an octopus.

The Outer Circle Railway’s construction from start to finish was supervised by the engineer John Monash who later became Australia’s most famous field general. Sir John was only 22 years of age when he commenced this project. His work diaries and correspondence held by the University of Melbourne Archives show that even at a young age, he already had a high level of technical competence which was combined with excellent logistics and people management skills. The Outer Circle Railway was built to a high standard. The intact brickwork of the old bridges, and the robust Chandler Highway Viaduct which once carried the Railway over the Yarra at Fairfield but now carries hundreds of cars and trucks per day are testament to the great engineering and skilled artisan work done on the Outer Circle Railway.

When the last section of the Outer Circle was finally opened in March 1891, its trains carried few passengers because of the sparseness of the population along the line, the non through train service and the long travelling times to Melbourne. The advent of the Great Depression of the 1890s hastened the closure of the Riversdale to Fairfield Section after only two years of operation. By the middle of 1897, the entire Outer Circle was closed, thus becoming a $600,000 white elephant. In 1898, the section from Camberwell to Riversdale was re-opened, and this was followed by the Riversdale to Deepdene section in 1900, and for the next 25 years a tiny little train affectionately known as the Deepdene Dasher ran a shuttle service up and down the line.

Competition from electric trams led to the replacement of the train service on the Riversdale to Deepdene section by a bus service which finally ceased operation in 1989. Today the only trains which now run on the Outer Circle are those operating between Camberwell and Alamein. Today the linear parkland and bike tracks of the old railway formation between Riversdale and Fairfield remain as a monument to the political corruption and intrigue which characterized Melbourne’s famous land boom of the 1880s.

Collections:

1964.0012 Reinforced Concrete & Monier Pipe Construction Co Pty Ltd

1997.0054 Reinforced Concrete & Monier Pipe Construction Co Pty Ltd

1963.0014 Baillieu Allard Pty Ltd


Hayward Letters Available Online

In 2011 the University of Melbourne Archives (UMA) was gifted a series of correspondence between the members of the Hayward Family from the plantation ‘Pieterszorg’ in Surinam (alternate spelling “Suriname”) to Bristol and London in England and Rotterdam and Amsterdam in Holland. The correspondence primarily concerns the family business in the production and trade of sugar and coffee and the related slave trade between 1799 and 1851.
Combined with the extensive Bright Family papers, which document plantations, trade and slavery in the Caribbean, the Hayward letters add to what is becoming an important collection of Atlantic studies research material at the University of Melbourne, unparalleled in Australia. Of particular interest is the fact that the Hayward collection spans the period after the abolition of the slave trade in the British Empire (1807) but continued under Dutch colonial rule in Surinam (and elsewhere in the Dutch colonies) until 1863. These letters also shed light on significant events such as the slave revolt in Barbados on 14 April 1816, and the effect of the Napoleonic wars on trade prices. Also revealed is the anxiety at the likely effect on business in the West Indies, if the Dutch should follow the English regarding the abolition of slavery.

Contributor: Denise Driver, University of Melbourne Archives

This internationally significant collection has been digitised and is now available for viewing at the University’s Digital Repository ‘Hayward Family Papers ‘Correspondence relating to ‘Pieterszorg’ Plantation, Surinam’ (2011.0031)

The Hayward letters in addition to the Bright papers provided students with unique primary sources in the University of Melbourne’s free Coursera online subject ‘Generating the Wealth of Nations‘ run by Jeff Borland. See the article ‘Slavery archive used in online course‘ published in the ‘Voice’ for more detail about the collection and its connection to the slave trade.


McPhersons Limited available online June 2014

Planning Machine: Thomas McPherson & Son Engineers Machine Stock List 1899
Planning Machine: Thomas McPherson & Son Engineers Machine Stock List 1899, 1987.0098, McPhersons Limited, University of Melbourne Archives

Established in Melbourne in 1860 McPhersons Limited recently celebrated its 150th year of continuous business, a major achievement in this day and age of company acquisition and competiveness. The key to their success has been their ability to diversify their business and adapt in a fast paced world. Founder Thomas McPherson created an iron mongering business which quickly evolved into a manufacturer of tools, equipment and machinery to service the needs of Victorian settlers. This well known brand had one of the best range of hardware available to satisfy needs of both the domestic home renovator and engineer. Their shop front in Collins Street, became a landmark and a choice destination for several generations of  farmers and builders. McPhersons have come a long way since those early days and have completely reinvented their focus from the manufacture of trade and hardware goods to the distribution of domestic product brands such as Manicare nail products and Euromaid kitchen appliances. Going from strength to strength their recent company acquisitions include ‘Revitanail’ and ‘Think Appliances’.

UMA has recently acquired the McPherson’s collection, which contains records, artefacts and photographs which document the growth of this successful Melbourne based family company. A listing for this collection will be available online by June 2014.


Number of posts found: 403

Post type

Previous posts